Hypothesis generation is a key part of intensifying supports for students. Educators identify a hypothesis and then gather diagnostic data to confirm or disconfirm the selected hypothesis. Use the table below to identify a possible hypothesis when students aren’t making progress. Select a hypothesis and then collect data using our suggested diagnostic data tools.
This handout provides an overview of three common decision rules educators can use to analyze academic progress monitoring data. These options include the four-point analysis method, trend line analysis method, and median of the last three data points method.
Data-based decision making is needed to support all students from the systemic level to the individual level. This data protocol is used by grade-level teams to create an instructional plan to improve the overall impact of core instruction.
This tool helps educators assess the extent to which effective generalization practices are in place for students. It's helpful when a student is successful in one setting, but not other settings. Educators assess how well they are teaching students to transfer skills across settings.
The MTSS Team Audit Activity is designed to assist schools in evaluating the teaming structures for multi-tiered system of supports (MTSS) implementation. It is used to integrate teams, improve efficiency, and determine a suitable teaming structure for MTSS.
Data-based decision making (DBDM) is the use of data to make decisions that benefit students. It occurs at all levels of MTSS implementation, from individual students to the district level. This infographic illustrates DBDM using the problem solving model, provides examples of how teams use data within MTSS and provides tips for data use.
Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) takes time – time to screen students, create the tiers, and set up progress monitoring processes. But when done thoughtfully and with clear intention, it is time well spent.
Across the nation there is often confusion about the use of, and alignment between, two frameworks aimed at supporting all students: Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) and Early Warning Systems (EWS). The goal of this guide is to provide a framing for how MTSS and EWS are related and how they align within a districtwide system of support.
Have you ever sat in a team meeting discussing a student, and before you know it, the bell is ringing? Somehow, the team spent the entire meeting on one student, even though they had planned to discuss four students. Or have you ever spent hours discussing a student, going over every detail of their education, only to still feel unsure how to help the student? Perhaps you’ve implemented an intervention and monitored the student’s progress, only to be disappointed at the student’s lack of growth.
Need a process to support individual students? Use this flipbook to remind your team which steps to follow as you apply data-based decision making to the needs of individual students. The flipbook reviews the step of the problem solving model for individual student problem-solving. The model includes problem identification, problem analysis, plan identification and implementation, and plan evaluation.